Resources › CA MCQ Practice
29 May 2026Economy3 questions

Supreme Court Upholds 28% GST on Online Money Gaming — ₹1.12 Lakh Crore Tax Liability Confirmed

UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.

1

Easy

1

Medium

1

Hard

Practice this set

3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required

Start test →Read the article first

Article summary

On May 27, 2026, a Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan upheld the constitutional validity of levying 28% GST on online money gaming, fantasy sports, and casino transactions in DGGI v. Gameskraft Technologies and related petitions. The court held that staking money on an uncertain outcome constitutes 'betting and gambling' under the CGST Act regardless of skill involved, and that the entire bet value — not just the platform fee — is taxable. The ruling overturns the Karnataka High Court's 2023 order that had quashed a ₹21,000 crore GST notice against Gameskraft. Across 71 companies, cumulative retrospective tax demands exceed ₹1.12 lakh crore.

What this tests

recallTests whether you read the article and retained key facts.
1Q
applicationTests whether you can apply the concept to a new scenario.
1Q
analysisTests whether you can reason across multiple related facts.
1Q

Sample questions — answers revealed after test

EconomyRecallEasy

Q1. In DGGI v. Gameskraft Technologies (May 2026), the Supreme Court upheld 28% GST on online money gaming. Which statutory entry formed the legal basis for classifying online gaming platforms as 'suppliers' and making the entire staked amount — not just the platform commission — the taxable value?

AEntry 6 of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, which covers 'actionable claims'
BEntry 5 of Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017, which covers 'supply of services'
CEntry 7 of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, which covers 'sale of land and buildings'
DEntry 2 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017, which covers 'supply of goods or services between related persons'
Answer revealed after you submit the test
EconomyApplicationMedium

Q2. An online skill-gaming startup operating before October 1, 2023, had been paying GST at 18% on its platform commission (gross gaming revenue), relying on legal advice that its games involved 'predominantly skill' and were therefore outside the betting/gambling category. Following the Supreme Court's May 2026 ruling in DGGI v. Gameskraft Technologies, which of the following best describes the startup's legal and tax position?

AThe startup owes 28% GST on the full staked amount for all periods from October 1, 2023 onwards only, since the CGST Amendment Act 2023 introduced a new tax levy prospectively from that date.
BThe startup owes 28% GST on the full staked amount for periods prior to October 1, 2023 as well, because the Supreme Court held the CGST Amendment Act 2023 was 'clarificatory' of existing law, not a new levy — making the skill-versus-chance defence legally irrelevant.
CThe startup is protected from pre-October 2023 demands because the Karnataka High Court's 2023 ruling quashing the Gameskraft notice established a binding precedent shielding skill-game operators from retrospective GST.
DThe startup owes 28% GST on the full staked amount only from May 27, 2026 — the date of the Supreme Court judgment — since retrospective tax application requires a separate parliamentary enactment beyond the CGST Amendment Act 2023.
Answer revealed after you submit the test
EconomyAnalysisHard

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the GST Council's constitutional framework and its role in the 28% GST on online gaming: 1. The GST Council is a constitutional body established under Article 279A of the Constitution of India. 2. In the GST Council's weighted voting system, the Union Government's vote carries one-third of the total weightage while States collectively hold two-thirds weightage, and decisions require a three-fourths majority of votes cast. 3. The GST Council's recommendation to apply 28% GST on online gaming — grouping it with betting and gambling — was implemented through the CGST Amendment Act 2023, effective October 1, 2023. 4. The Supreme Court in DGGI v. Gameskraft Technologies held that the GST Council's retrospective recommendation was ultra vires Article 265 of the Constitution because no tax can be levied without contemporaneous authority of law. How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one
BOnly two
COnly three
DAll four
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Practice all 3 questions →All CA MCQ sets