PM POSHAN Scheme Revamp — Mid-Day Meal Nutrition Norms and Fortification Mandate
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
The Ministry of Education revised the nutritional norms under PM POSHAN Shakti Nirman (formerly Mid-Day Meal Scheme) in March 2026, mandating 100% fortified rice in all school meals from Class 1 to Class 8, increasing caloric requirements for primary school children by 15%, and introducing a weekly egg or milk provision in 11 aspirational district states. The scheme covers approximately 11.8 crore children across 11.4 lakh government and government-aided schools. PM POSHAN was renamed and restructured from the Mid-Day Meal Scheme under the National Education Policy 2020 framework.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. With reference to the PM POSHAN Shakti Nirman scheme, which of the following statements is correct?
Q2. A state government in North-East India reports that its PM POSHAN implementation cost for food procurement is ₹100 crore in a financial year. Based on the scheme's funding norms, what would be the state's own contribution to this food cost, and which of the following additional statements about the scheme is correct?
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the PM POSHAN Shakti Nirman scheme and its 2026 fortified rice mandate: 1. The fortified rice mandate specifies iron, folic acid, and Vitamin B12 as the three micronutrients to be added, targeting the multi-causal micronutrient deficiency driving childhood anaemia. 2. NFHS-5 data, which informed the fortification mandate, recorded an anaemia prevalence of 67% among children aged 6–59 months. 3. Rice fortification using Fortified Rice Kernels (FRK) at a 1:100 blending ratio is easily verifiable in field conditions through standard visual inspection, ensuring robust enforcement. 4. PM POSHAN's coverage cutoff at Class 8 adequately addresses the highest-risk anaemia transition point for adolescent girls, as NFHS-5 records lower anaemia prevalence among adolescent girls than among younger children. Which of the statements given above are correct?