Resources › CA MCQ Practice
2 Jun 2026Polity & Governance3 questions

J&K High Court Rules President and Governor Can Terminate Government Employees Without Inquiry for State Security

UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.

1

Easy

1

Medium

1

Hard

Practice this set

3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required

Start test →Read the article first

Article summary

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has ruled that the President or Governor holds the constitutional authority to terminate government employees without conducting a prior inquiry if it is deemed necessary for the security of the state. This ruling interprets the exceptions provided under Article 311(2)(c) of the Indian Constitution, which bypasses the standard requirement of a departmental inquiry before dismissal. The court emphasized that the subjective satisfaction of the highest executive authority regarding national security concerns overrides the procedural safeguards typically afforded to civil servants.

What this tests

recallTests whether you read the article and retained key facts.
1Q
applicationTests whether you can apply the concept to a new scenario.
1Q
analysisTests whether you can reason across multiple related facts.
1Q

Sample questions — answers revealed after test

Polity & GovernanceRecallEasy

Q1. Article 311 of the Indian Constitution provides procedural safeguards to civil servants against arbitrary dismissal. Under which specific clause does the Constitution permit the President or Governor to dispense with a mandatory inquiry before dismissing a civil servant?

AArticle 311(2)(c), when the President or Governor is satisfied that holding such an inquiry is not expedient in the interest of the security of the State
BArticle 311(2)(b), when it is not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry as determined by the concerned disciplinary authority
CArticle 310(1), which vests absolute discretionary power in the President to terminate any civil servant at pleasure without any condition
DArticle 312, which authorises Parliament to create All India Services and confer powers of summary dismissal on the Union Government
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Polity & GovernanceApplicationMedium

Q2. A senior IAS officer posted in a sensitive border district is dismissed from service by direct order of the Governor, without being served a charge-sheet or given an opportunity to be heard. The dismissal order states that the Governor is satisfied that holding an inquiry would not be expedient in the interest of the security of the State. The officer challenges this dismissal in the High Court. Which of the following correctly describes the constitutional position and the scope of judicial review available to the officer?

AThe dismissal is constitutionally valid under Article 311(2)(c); the High Court can review it only for mala fide intent on the part of the Governor, not on the merits of the security assessment
BThe dismissal is unconstitutional because Article 311(2) mandates that even in security-related cases, the officer must be served a charge-sheet before termination
CThe High Court must conduct a full merits review of whether the security threat was genuine, as subjective satisfaction of the Governor is not immune from judicial scrutiny under Article 32
DThe dismissal is valid, but the officer retains an absolute right to a post-dismissal inquiry under Article 311(3) regardless of the security ground invoked
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Polity & GovernanceAnalysisHard

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding Article 311 of the Indian Constitution and the exception carved out under Article 311(2)(c): 1. Article 311(2) requires that no civil servant shall be dismissed, removed or reduced in rank without being given a reasonable opportunity to be heard — this protection applies universally and admits of no exception. 2. The 'satisfaction' of the President or Governor under Article 311(2)(c) is subjective in character, meaning courts cannot question it on merits but can review it for mala fide intent or complete absence of material. 3. Article 311(2)(c) can be invoked by the President only in respect of civil servants of the Union, while Governors can invoke it only in respect of civil servants of the State in which they hold office. 4. When the exception under Article 311(2)(c) is invoked, the civil servant retains no right whatsoever — not even the right to challenge the order in a court of law on grounds of mala fide. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A2 and 3 only
B1 and 4 only
C2 only
D1, 2 and 3 only
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Practice all 3 questions →All CA MCQ sets