Bengal Removes 77 Muslim Communities From OBC List, Shrinks Quota
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
West Bengal's newly elected BJP government has revoked OBC status for 77 Muslim communities that were granted such recognition during the preceding Trinamool Congress (TMC) administration, simultaneously reducing the state's OBC reservation ceiling from 10% to 7%. The move directly challenges the TMC-era policy of extending backward class benefits to Muslim communities on the basis of social and educational backwardness, a practice that had already attracted Supreme Court scrutiny. India's constitutional framework under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) permits states to identify backward classes, but the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) held that religion alone cannot be the basis for OBC classification. The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), a constitutional body under Article 338B, has the mandate to examine inclusion and exclusion requests, making any state-level revision subject to both judicial and statutory oversight. For UPSC aspirants, this event crystallises the intersection of federalism, social justice jurisprudence, and the politics of reservation — a recurring Mains theme.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. The 105th Constitutional Amendment (2021) was enacted primarily to address which of the following?
Q2. A State government proposes to include a group of Muslim weavers in its State OBC list, citing data showing that over 80% of the community has not completed primary education and earns below the state poverty line. A petitioner challenges this inclusion solely on the ground that religion cannot be a criterion for OBC classification. Which of the following best represents the constitutional position on this challenge?
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional framework for Other Backward Classes (OBC) reservations in India: 1. Articles 15(4) and 16(4) are mandatory provisions that require the State to make reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. 2. The 102nd Constitutional Amendment (2018) inserted Article 342A, empowering the President to notify the Central OBC list, and Article 338B, establishing the NCBC as a constitutional body. 3. The Indra Sawhney judgment (1992) introduced the concept of the 'creamy layer' for OBCs and set a 50% ceiling on total reservations, subject to limited exceptions. 4. The 105th Constitutional Amendment (2021) restored States' power to maintain their own OBC lists by overturning the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maratha reservation case. Which of the above statements are correct?