Resources › CA MCQ Practice
1 Jul 2026INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS3 questions

Indus Waters Treaty: Pakistan Asserts 'Valid, Binding and Operative' Status

UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.

1

Easy

1

Medium

1

Hard

Practice this set

3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required

Start test →Read the article first

Article summary

Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar declared the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) 'valid, binding and operative,' warning that any attempt to deprive Pakistan of its allocated waters would have 'profound consequences' for regional peace and security. This statement follows India's decision in May 2025 to place the IWT in abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack, marking the first time India has formally suspended participation in the 1960 World Bank-brokered treaty. The IWT, signed between India and Pakistan on September 19, 1960, allocates the three eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, Sutlej — exclusively to India and the three western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, Chenab — primarily to Pakistan, covering approximately 168 million acre-feet of annual water flow. India's position is that Pakistan's continued support for cross-border terrorism fundamentally alters the treaty's foundational premise of good-faith cooperation. The standoff raises critical questions about the legal enforceability of international water treaties, the World Bank's dispute-resolution role, and whether water can be legitimately deployed as a strategic instrument — all live UPSC examination themes.

What this tests

recallTests whether you read the article and retained key facts.
1Q
applicationTests whether you can apply the concept to a new scenario.
1Q
analysisTests whether you can reason across multiple related facts.
1Q

Sample questions — answers revealed after test

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSRecallEasy

Q1. The Indus Waters Treaty (1960) established a three-tier dispute resolution mechanism. Which of the following correctly represents the sequence of escalation under this mechanism?

APermanent Indus Commission → Neutral Expert → Court of Arbitration at The Hague
BPermanent Indus Commission → International Court of Justice → Court of Arbitration at The Hague
CJoint Rivers Commission → Neutral Expert → International Court of Justice
DPermanent Indus Commission → Neutral Expert → UN Secretary-General's mediation
Answer revealed after you submit the test
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSApplicationMedium

Q2. India placed the Indus Waters Treaty 'in abeyance' in May 2025 following the Pahalgam terror attack. A legal team advising Pakistan is assessing the validity of India's suspension under international law. Which of the following statements would most accurately support Pakistan's counter-argument against India's suspension?

AUnder VCLT Article 60, treaty suspension is permissible only in response to a 'material breach' by the other party — defined as violation of a provision essential to the treaty's object and purpose — and the IWT contains no provision linking Pakistan's counter-terrorism obligations to its water-sharing commitments.
BUnder VCLT Article 62, a fundamental change of circumstances (rebus sic stantibus) automatically voids a treaty when the geopolitical context has changed beyond the original parties' contemplation, and India may invoke this to suspend the IWT unilaterally.
CThe World Bank, as the treaty's broker, has the authority to adjudicate disputes over treaty suspension and its formal silence on India's action constitutes implicit endorsement of India's legal position.
DThe IWT's survival through the 1965 and 1971 wars establishes a customary international law norm that water-sharing treaties are non-suspendable under any circumstances, including acts of terrorism.
Answer revealed after you submit the test
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSAnalysisHard

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the strategic and legal implications of India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in May 2025: 1. India's suspension is the first formal interruption of the IWT in its 65-year history, as the treaty remained operative even through the India-Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971. 2. Under the IWT's river allocation, India has unrestricted use of the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab, while Pakistan has exclusive rights over the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. 3. India's freeze on Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) meetings eliminates the primary mechanism for real-time hydrological data exchange, creating early-warning capacity gaps for floods and droughts in the Indus basin. 4. China's observation of India's unilateral suspension precedent is strategically significant because India is downstream of China on the Brahmaputra river system. Which of the statements given above are correct?

A1 and 3 only
B1, 3 and 4 only
C2 and 4 only
D1, 2 and 3 only
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Practice all 3 questions →All CA MCQ sets