Policeman Questioned in Abduction and Killing of Six Naga Men in Manipur
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
A policeman from Kangpokpi district in Manipur has been questioned in connection with the abduction and killing of six Naga men, triggering public outrage and prompting the State Government to hand over the investigation to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The killings occurred against the backdrop of the prolonged ethnic conflict in Manipur that has simmered since May 2023, primarily between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, but now implicating Naga communities and raising fears of a widening fault line. The alleged involvement of a serving police officer underscores the deep institutional penetration of ethnic loyalties in Manipur's security apparatus, a structural problem that has repeatedly undermined state-led peace efforts. The NIA's entry signals the Centre's recognition that the state police cannot credibly investigate crimes in which its own personnel may be implicated. For UPSC, this case sits at the intersection of federalism, internal security, police accountability, and the constitutional framework governing special investigative agencies.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. Under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, which of the following correctly describes the appellate structure for orders of NIA Special Courts?
Q2. A state government, alleging that the NIA has encroached upon its jurisdiction by taking over a case involving ethnic violence, files a challenge arguing that state consent was required before the NIA could begin investigation. Which of the following best describes the legal position under the NIA Act, 2008?
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional and legal framework implicated when the NIA takes over a case involving alleged ethnic killings by a serving state police officer in Manipur: 1. Article 355 of the Constitution imposes a duty on the Union to protect every state against internal disturbance and to ensure governance is carried on in accordance with the Constitution, providing constitutional grounding for central intervention in the Manipur situation. 2. A prosecution against a serving police officer for acts done in the discharge of official duty requires prior sanction under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which replaces the corresponding provision of the CrPC. 3. The NIA's jurisdiction over the case would be established only if the killings are formally linked to a proscribed organisation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, since ethnic violence per se is not a scheduled offence under the NIA Act. 4. Union List Entry 8 of the Seventh Schedule provides the constitutional basis for Parliament to establish a federal investigation agency with pan-India jurisdiction over internal security matters.