From Diplomatic Rupture to Crime Syndicate: The Nijjar Case Reframed
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
Canadian authorities have stated there is no evidence linking Indian officials to the June 2023 killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar — a significant shift from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's earlier allegation that Indian agents were involved. In parallel, US federal authorities unsealed indictments charging imprisoned gangster Lawrence Bishnoi and his associate Satinderjeet Singh (Goldy Brar), among a total of 37 defendants across three Los Angeles indictments, as part of an international law-enforcement sweep codenamed 'Operation Hard Ball' targeting Indian-origin transnational criminal syndicates involved in extortion, drug trafficking and contract violence. The reframing matters diplomatically: it recasts a bitter India-Canada dispute — which had escalated to expulsions and frozen ties — as, at least in part, the work of transnational organised crime rather than state action. For UPSC, the episode links bilateral diplomacy, the security challenge of diaspora-linked crime and radicalism, and the machinery of cross-border law-enforcement cooperation.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. With reference to the instruments available for tackling diaspora-linked transnational crime, which one of the following statements is correct?
Q2. A killing abroad is initially attributed to a foreign state and later linked to an organised criminal syndicate. Which one of the following best explains why attribution in such cases is analytically difficult?
Q3. Consider the following statements: 1. The 2023 killing in Canada triggered a diplomatic crisis leading to reciprocal expulsions, India having rejected the allegation of official involvement. 2. Canadian authorities have since stated that there is no evidence linking Indian officials to the killing. 3. Operation Hard Ball resulted in indictments in Los Angeles charging 37 defendants across three indictments, and those indictments established that the killing in Canada was directed by a foreign state. Which of the statements given above are correct?