35 kg or 7 kg? The AAY Ration Change That Split India Down a North–South Line
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
The Union government has proposed amending the way Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) — the scheme for the poorest households under the National Food Security Act, 2013 — allocates foodgrains, changing it from a flat 35 kg per household per month to 7 kg per person per month, subject to a ceiling of 35 kg per household. The Food and Public Distribution Department argues the household-based system creates intra-category inequities, since a large and a small AAY family currently receive the same 35 kg. Tamil Nadu and Kerala have strongly opposed the move: because southern states have smaller average household sizes, a per-person formula reduces their allocations. Tamil Nadu estimates its AAY allocation could fall from about 65,261 tonnes to 42,040 tonnes a month, as roughly 15.75 lakh of its 18.64 lakh AAY households have fewer than five members. Civil-society groups warn of a perceived North–South imbalance. For UPSC, the debate is a sharp case study in the design of food-security entitlements, cooperative federalism, and the trade-off between horizontal equity and demographic fairness.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. With reference to the National Food Security Act, 2013, which one of the following statements is correct?
Q2. Tamil Nadu estimates that its AAY allocation could fall from about 65,261 to about 42,040 tonnes a month under the proposed change. Which one of the following best explains that projected fall?
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding the proposed change to AAY entitlements: 1. The stated objective is to remove intra-category inequity, since a flat household entitlement gives large and small AAY families the same quantity of grain. 2. A per-person rule tends to favour States with larger average household size, which is why a perceived North–South imbalance has been raised. 3. Tamil Nadu and Kerala have supported the change as a move toward a more equitable per-capita basis of distribution. Which of the statements given above are correct?