₹1.05 Lakh Crore Lost in One Year: The Arithmetic of India's Derivatives Boom
UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.
1
Easy
1
Medium
1
Hard
Practice this set
3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required
Article summary
SEBI's study of profit and loss in the equity derivatives segment found that net losses by individual traders widened to about ₹1.05 lakh crore in FY25 from roughly ₹74,800 crore in FY24, an increase of about 41 per cent, with more than 91 per cent of individual traders losing money. The study covered the top thirteen brokers with a combined base of around 96 lakh unique F&O traders. Commentary on the segment notes that algorithmic systems generate the overwhelming majority of institutional and proprietary trading profits, which frames retail participation as competition against automated counterparties operating at speeds and scales an individual cannot match. SEBI has responded by recalibrating contract sizes, rationalising weekly index derivatives and raising tail-risk coverage on expiry days, and unique trader numbers fell about 20 per cent over six months.
What this tests
Sample questions — answers revealed after test
Q1. In the context of the equity derivatives market, what does the term futures and options refer to?
Q2. SEBI's data show that over 90 per cent of individual traders lost money in equity derivatives while the segment's overall turnover remained very high. Which one of the following best reconciles these two facts?
Q3. Consider the following statements regarding SEBI's response to retail losses in the derivatives segment: 1. Measures adopted included recalibrating the contract size for equity derivatives and rationalising weekly index derivative products. 2. In the period after these measures, the number of unique individual traders in the segment declined compared with the previous year. 3. Because derivatives serve a legitimate hedging function, SEBI's objective was to eliminate the segment entirely rather than to moderate retail speculation within it. Which of the statements given above are correct?