Resources › CA MCQ Practice
21 Jul 2026SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY3 questions

$3,000 a Book: The Largest Copyright Settlement in US History and What It Settles

UPSC-standard MCQs with explanations, trap analysis, and approach guide. Answer after the test — not before.

1

Easy

1

Medium

1

Hard

Practice this set

3 questions · full analysis after submission · no sign-up required

Start test →Read the article first

Article summary

A United States federal court has granted final approval to a $1.5 billion settlement of a class action brought by authors against the AI company Anthropic, in what is reported to be the largest copyright settlement in American history. The payout works out to roughly $3,000 per work across an estimated 500,000 works, distributed among authors and publishers holding the rights, and counsel stated that more than 91 per cent of covered rights-holders had claimed their share. The settlement followed a ruling by Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California, who distinguished between two ways the company had built its training library: books it purchased and scanned, which he treated as permissible, and books downloaded from pirate repositories, which he held unlawful and allowed to proceed toward trial. The company settled rather than face that trial.

What this tests

recallTests whether you read the article and retained key facts.
1Q
applicationTests whether you can apply the concept to a new scenario.
1Q
analysisTests whether you can reason across multiple related facts.
1Q

Sample questions — answers revealed after test

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYRecallEasy

Q1. The Anthropic copyright settlement concerned which of the following?

AA dispute over the use of authors' copyrighted books as training data for an AI system.
BA patent dispute over the design of AI processor chips.
CA trademark dispute over the name of an AI chatbot.
DA data-privacy claim over the collection of users' personal conversations.
Answer revealed after you submit the test
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYApplicationMedium

Q2. Commentary on the Anthropic settlement drew a distinction between how the training material was acquired and how it was used. Why does that distinction matter?

ABecause acquiring works through unauthorised or pirated copies can attract liability independently of whether the eventual use in training might otherwise be defensible, so the two questions are legally separable.
BBecause acquisition and use are the same act in law, so the distinction has no practical consequence.
CBecause the method of acquisition determines the market value of the trained model.
DBecause only the use of a work, never its acquisition, can ever give rise to copyright liability.
Answer revealed after you submit the test
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYAnalysisHard

Q3. Consider the following statements about AI training and copyright across jurisdictions: 1. A settlement resolves a dispute between the parties by agreement and does not establish a binding legal precedent in the way a contested judgment does. 2. The United States applies an open-ended fair use doctrine, whereas India applies a closed list of fair dealing exceptions, so the same training practice can be assessed differently in the two systems. 3. Because Anthropic settled for a large sum, it follows that training AI on copyrighted works has been definitively held unlawful in the United States. Which of the statements given above are correct?

A1 only
B1 and 2 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Answer revealed after you submit the test
Practice all 3 questions →All CA MCQ sets