Practice › Directive Verb Decoder
Mains/Directive Verbs/Critically Examine

Critically Examine

Directive verb

Examine the topic AND explicitly challenge the assumptions or premises that underlie it. The critique is the differentiator.

Rubric shape

INTRO

State the proposition AND name the assumption you will challenge

DIM 1

What the proposition claims and what supports it

DIM 2

The assumption beneath the proposition

DIM 3

The critique of that assumption — where it breaks down

DIM 4

The counter-evidence or limit case

CONC

A verdict that names what the critique reveals — more pointed than 'Examine'

Minimum dimensions:4

150-Word Discipline

Practise 10-mark answers

Practice on the real format

A4 ruled sheets matching the UPSC answer booklet. Spatial markers show where each section should end.

Opens in browser → File → Print → Save as PDF to keep a copy.

The Forge

Train the cognitive demand of "Critically Examine" in The Forge.

Word count distribution

15%
25%
20%
25%
15%
Intro · 15%
Proposition · 25%
Assumption · 20%
Critique · 25%
Verdict · 15%

Examine the topic AND explicitly challenge the assumption beneath it. The critique of the premise is the differentiator.

Paper lens
Governance · Constitution · IR

Identify the constitutional or governance assumption and challenge it with institutional evidence.

PropositionThe dominant reading of this constitutional provision, institution, or policy.
AssumptionThe premise it rests on — e.g. that institutions function as designed, or that rights are adequately protected.
CritiqueCAG data, SC judgements, or state-level implementation failures that break the assumption.
VerdictWhat the critique reveals about the gap between constitutional intent and governance reality.

What most aspirants write

Treating 'critically examine' as 'examine with strong language.' The word 'critically' is not an intensifier — it requires you to name and challenge the assumption the question rests on.

What the rubric actually requires

The assumption beneath the proposition must be named explicitly. The critique must target that assumption, not just list counter-examples. This is the highest cognitive demand in the directive verb taxonomy.