Logic — Analytical Argument Consistency
Question
Consider the following three statements, namely S1, S2 and S3: S1. Protecting the environment is an existential exigency for humans, given the impact of environmental degradation on climate change. S2. Scientific consensus has not been achieved with regard to the extent of the contribution of human intervention to climate change. S3. Environmental activism includes climate alarmism and other extremist points of view that often become the focus of climate change deniers. Which of the following relationships based on the statements given above is/are correct? [cite: 4541, 4601, 4602, 4603, 4604, 4625]
Select the answer using the code given below.
Options
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
1 and 2 only
3 only
Explanation
Let us analyze the logical relationships between the statements:
Since only relationship 3 is correct, option (d) is the correct choice.
Answer: (d).
Question details
Year
2026
Paper
CSAT
Question
Q51
Section
Logical Reasoning
Sub-topic
Statement-Conclusion
Type
Statement-Conclusion
Difficulty
Medium
Source hint
Logical reasoning — logical consistency and structural relations
See all questions on Statement-Conclusion
Browse every tagged question across all years