President's Rule and Constitutional Provisions
Question
Which of the following are not necessarily the consequences of the proclamation of the President's rule in a State?
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- 1.
Dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly
- 2.
Removal of the Council of Ministers in the State
- 3.
Dissolution of the local bodies
Options
1 and 2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Explanation
When President's rule is proclaimed under Article 356, the following are necessary consequences: (1) The State Council of Ministers is removed or dissolved, and (2) The State Legislative Assembly can be dissolved, but dissolution is not mandatory—it is discretionary. However, (3) Dissolution of local bodies (municipal corporations, village panchayats) is not a necessary consequence of President's rule. Local bodies can continue functioning independently. Therefore, dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly (though possible) and dissolution of local bodies are not necessarily required consequences. The removal of the Council of Ministers is a necessary consequence. The question asks what are NOT necessarily consequences, so both 1 (dissolution of assembly) and 3 (dissolution of local bodies) are not necessarily consequences. > President's Rule: CM removal (necessary); Assembly dissolution (discretionary); Local body dissolution (not necessary). Answer: b.
Question details
Year
2017
Paper
GS Paper 1
Question
Q96
Subject
Polity
Sub-topic
Constitutional Emergency - President's Rule
Type
Statement-based
Difficulty
Medium
Nature
Static
Source hint
NCERT Polity Ch.13 - Union and State Executives
See all questions on Constitutional Emergency - President's Rule
Browse every tagged question across all years