Summoning and Sessions of Parliament
Question
Consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1.
The President of India can summon a session of the Parliament at such place as he/she thinks fit.
- 2.
The Constitution of India provides for three sessions of the Parliament in a year, but it is not mandatory to conduct all three sessions.
- 3.
There is no minimum number of days that the Parliament is required to meet in a year.
Options
1 only
2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
Explanation
Article 85(1) states that the President shall from time to time summon each House of Parliament to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit (Statement 1 is correct). The Constitution does not specify the number of sessions in a year; it only dictates that there should not be a gap of more than six months between two sessions. The convention of 3 sessions is parliamentary practice, not a constitutional provision (Statement 2 is incorrect). There is no constitutional mandate specifying a minimum number of working days for Parliament in a year (Statement 3 is correct). > One-line conceptual takeaway: The Constitution only mandates a maximum gap of 6 months between parliamentary sessions, leaving scheduling flexibility to the executive. Answer: (c).
Question details
Year
2020
Paper
GS Paper 1
Question
Q20
Subject
Polity
Sub-topic
Parliament & Legislature
Type
Statement-based
Difficulty
Medium
Nature
Static
Source hint
Article 85 of the Constitution
Same sub-topic — other years
Parliament & Legislature has appeared in multiple papers:
See all questions on Parliament & Legislature
Browse every tagged question across all years