Five New Judges Join Supreme Court After Sanctioned Strength Raised to 34+CJI
Summary
The Union government increased the Supreme Court's sanctioned strength from 33 to 37 judges (excluding the Chief Justice of India), following which five new judges were elevated to the apex court under Chief Justice Surya Kant.
●The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 governs the court's numerical strength, and Parliament has periodically amended it to address rising pendency — the last increase was from 30 to 33 in 2019.
●The latest expansion is significant because over 80,000 cases are pending before the Supreme Court, and a larger bench strength enables faster constitution of larger benches and reduces delays.
●The elevations are also designed to improve regional representation across India's diverse geography and enhance gender diversity on the Bench, both longstanding concerns in judicial appointments.
●For UPSC, this development intersects constitutional law, judicial independence, the collegium system, and access to justice.
Judiciary & Legal Framework
This sub-topic has appeared in 14 UPSC Prelims questions.
The Supreme Court's sanctioned strength is not fixed by the Constitution itself — Article 124(1) merely says there shall be a Supreme Court 'consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.' Parliament has used this enabling power multiple times: from 7 (original) → 10 → 13 → 17 → 25 → 30 → 33, and now 37 (excluding CJI). This makes the strength a statutory matter under the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956, not a constitutional amendment.
●Judges are appointed by the President under Article 124(2) in consultation with the collegium.
●The gap between sanctioned and working strength, combined with pendency of over 80,000 cases, is the structural driver of each expansion.
The key UPSC takeaway is that Supreme Court judge strength is set by Parliament through ordinary legislation, not by constitutional amendment — making it far easier to change than most people assume.
◎ In Simple Words
Think of the Supreme Court like a very busy hospital — if there are too few doctors, patients wait a very long time. India's government decided to add more 'doctors' (judges) by increasing the total number allowed from 33 to 37 (not counting the head judge). Five new judges were then appointed to fill some of these new seats. This is meant to help clear the huge backlog of cases and also make sure judges come from different parts of India and include more women.
Factual Pointers
Practice · 1 question
Which of the following correctly describes the constitutional and legal basis for determining the number of judges in the Supreme Court of India?
Topics