Syllogism evaluation with 'some' and 'all' propositions
Question
Three Statements followed by three Conclusions are given below. You have to take the Statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows/follow from the Statements, disregarding the commonly known facts: Statement-1: Some doctors are teachers. Statement-2: All teachers are engineers. Statement-3: All engineers are scientists. Conclusion-I: Some scientists are doctors. Conclusion-II: All engineers are doctors. Conclusion-III: Some engineers are doctors.
Options
Only Conclusion-I
Only Conclusion-II
Both Conclusion-I and Conclusion-III
Both Conclusion-I and Conclusion-II
Explanation
Construct the logical chain from the premises:
Because the Teacher overlap zone (D \cap T) is fully swallowed by the Engineer circle (E), and then entirely swallowed again by the Scientist circle (S), that specific group of Doctor-Teachers automatically becomes Doctor-Engineers and Doctor-Scientists.
Evaluate Conclusions:
Conclusions I and III logically follow.
Answer: (c).
Question details
Year
2022
Paper
CSAT
Question
Q39
Section
Logical & Analytical Reasoning
Sub-topic
Syllogism
Type
Factual single
Difficulty
Medium
Source hint
Some doctors are teachers. All teachers are engineers.
Same sub-topic — other years
Syllogism has appeared in multiple CSAT papers:
See all questions on Syllogism
Browse every tagged question across all years