RC — Legal Statutory Provisions
Question
[PASSAGE] The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, or the JJ Act, 2015 allows for the possibility for trying adolescents above 16 as adults if they are accused of committing a heinous offence. A heinous offence is one with a minimum punishment of seven years. Offences such as culpable homicide and causing death by negligence, which are common in drunken driving cases, are not heinous offences because they do not have a prescribed minimum punishment. The JJ Act, amended in 2021, now categorises an offence that has no minimum sentence, but has a maximum sentence of seven years or more as a serious offence which nonetheless, in the opinion of activists, does not merit the transfer of a case to the adult criminal justice system.
[QUESTION] Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Options
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
Let us check both statements directly against the factual rules established in the text [cite: 3820, 3821, 3822, 3823]:
Since both statements accurately restate explicit facts from the text, option (c) is the correct choice.
Answer: (c).
Question details
Year
2026
Paper
CSAT
Question
Q20
Section
Comprehension
Sub-topic
RC — Fact vs Opinion
Type
Reading Comprehension
Difficulty
Easy
Source hint
RC passage — statutory definitions
See all questions on RC — Fact vs Opinion
Browse every tagged question across all years