Ecological Succession in Grasslands
Question
In the grasslands, trees do not replace the grasses as a part of an ecological succession because of (a) insects and fungi (b) limited sunlight and paucity of nutrients (c) water limits and fire (d) None of the above
Options
insects and fungi
limited sunlight and paucity of nutrients
water limits and fire
None of the above
Explanation
In grassland ecosystems, trees do not naturally replace grasses as part of ecological succession primarily due to water limitations and fire. Grasslands experience periodic droughts and natural or human-induced fires that prevent tree seedlings from establishing. Fire is particularly important as it kills young tree saplings but grasses can quickly regenerate from their roots. Water scarcity in many grasslands prevents tree growth. While insects and fungi may play minor roles, and nutrient levels vary, the dominant ecological factors preventing tree succession in grasslands are fire frequency and water availability. Option (b) is less accurate because many grasslands aren't necessarily nutrient-poor, and sunlight isn't limiting for tree growth. > Fire and water scarcity are the primary successional barriers in grasslands — fire kills saplings while grasses regrow. Answer: (c).
Question details
Year
2014
Paper
GS Paper 1
Question
Q22
Subject
Environment
Sub-topic
Ecological Succession and Grassland Ecosystems
Type
Factual single
Difficulty
Medium
Nature
Static
Source hint
NCERT Biology - Ecology and Ecosystem
See all questions on Ecological Succession and Grassland Ecosystems
Browse every tagged question across all years