Ch 1: Power Sharing
This chapter anchors the foundational conceptual framework of horizontal and vertical power sharing, serving as the theoretical basis for Indian federalism, separation of powers, and majoritarian challenges.
Belgium and Sri Lanka
Highly relevant for understanding demographic complexities and ethnic configurations before constitutional design. Focuses on the geography of Belgium (borders with France, Germany, Netherlands, Luxembourg) and the linguistic demographics of Brussels (80% French, 20% Dutch). UPSC often sets traps on demographic classifications or geographical associations. Do not skip the demographic statistics as they explain why asymmetric federal solutions were needed.
Ethnic: A social division based on shared culture where people believe in their common descent due to similarities of physical type or of culture.
Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka
Exposes the structural flaws of majoritarianism using Sri Lanka's post-independence legislative track record. Key details include the 1956 Act recognizing Sinhala as the sole official language, and state patronage of Buddhism (Article 9). Understand how majoritarian policies run contrary to Indian constitutionalism's minority protections under Articles 25-30. Skip detailed political narrative of the civil war but focus on the policy instruments of exclusion.
Majoritarianism: A belief that the majority community should be able to rule a country in whichever way it wants, by disregarding minority wishes.
Accommodation in Belgium
Crucial section covering constitutional engineering. Belgium amended its constitution four times between 1970 and 1993 to create a unique power-sharing model. Note the equal representation in the central cabinet, state governments not being subordinate to the center, and the creation of 'Community Governments' with legislative power over cultural, educational, and linguistic issues. UPSC tests these elements under cooperative and asymmetric federalism concepts.
Focuses on the sectarian power-sharing agreement of Lebanon where the President must be Maronite Catholic, Prime Minister a Sunni Muslim, Deputy PM Orthodox Christian, and Speaker a Shia Muslim.
Why power sharing is desirable?
Highly conceptual section detailing the dual arguments for power sharing: Prudential vs Moral reasons. Prudential reasons focus on reducing social conflict, maintaining political stability, and avoiding tyrannical majority outcomes (utilitarian/realist). Moral reasons view power sharing as the intrinsic spirit of democracy where stakeholders have a say (normative/constitutionalist). Directly relevant for Mains GS-4 and Prelims conceptual polity questions.
Forms of power sharing
Extremely high-yield section mapping directly to Indian constitutional architecture. Horizontal division (checks and balances) relates to Article 50 and separation of powers. Vertical division maps to federalism (Schedule VII, Parts XI and XII). Power sharing among social groups is reflected in Article 330/332 (reservations). UPSC directly tests separation of powers (Article 50) and federal structures from this theoretical base.