Aadhaar Act and Supreme Court Judgements
Question
Consider the following statements: Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1.
Aadhaar metadata cannot be stored for more than three months.
- 2.
State cannot enter into any contract with private corporations for sharing of Aadhaar data.
- 3.
Aadhaar is mandatory for obtaining insurance products.
- 4.
Aadhaar is mandatory for getting benefits funded out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
Options
1 and 4 only
2 and 4 only
3 only
1, 2 and 3 only
Explanation
Supreme Court's 2018 Aadhaar verdict struck down the storage of metadata for 5 years, restricting it to 6 months (not 3 months), making Statement 1 incorrect. The Court struck down Section 57, prohibiting private companies from using Aadhaar data, making Statement 2 correct. Aadhaar is not mandatory for insurance products or bank accounts (Statement 3 is incorrect). Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act states that it is mandatory for benefits funded from the Consolidated Fund of India (Statement 4 is correct). > One-line conceptual takeaway: Aadhaar is mandatory only for welfare benefits drawn from the Consolidated Fund of India and cannot be used by private entities. Answer: (b).
Question details
Year
2020
Paper
GS Paper 1
Question
Q1
Subject
Polity
Sub-topic
Fundamental Rights, DPSP & Duties
Type
Statement-based
Difficulty
Medium
Nature
Current-affairs-linked
Source hint
Supreme Court Aadhaar Verdict 2018
Same sub-topic — other years
Fundamental Rights, DPSP & Duties has appeared in multiple papers:
See all questions on Fundamental Rights, DPSP & Duties
Browse every tagged question across all years